Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:47

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
2 fans die and an officer is in a coma after Champions League celebrations in France - NBC News
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
🎀 Pinterest trend; search kpop mother, father, wife, husband, kid
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Common Diabetes Drug Linked to 'Exceptional Longevity' in Women - ScienceAlert
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What makes you feel guilty the most?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What did Chandrashekhar Azad say about Hinduism during a podcast?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Snap plans to sell lightweight, consumer AR glasses in 2026 - TechCrunch
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
UNC Botches Lead, Falls to Arizona in Super Regional Rubber Match - 247Sports